The blame game is in full swing in the bay area following allegations that municipalities are playing "musical chairs" with their homeless population – using resources to transport passengers, drug addicts and the mentally ill to San Francisco and abandoning them.
The newly expanded San Mateo County district SamTrans Bus Service It begins on the Peninsula and ends at the Embarcadero in San Francisco.
SamTrans was recently captured by cameras, leaving groups of homeless men and women on the city's streets and parks at the end of the line near the waterfront.
Some of these same passengers were placed on the bus in the San Francisco International Airport, located in San Mateo County, by police officers seen handing out free bus tokens to prevent homeless people from sleeping at the terminals.
The confusion at the end of the night ends when the homeless are kicked from the bus at the last stop around 2:30 in the morning. From there, they are often stunned and confused about where they are and how they got there. They spend their time wandering aimlessly through the crowded tourist areas in the early hours of the morning.
"It's unscrupulous that agencies are playing what appear to be musical chairs with the homeless," supervisor Aaron Peskin, whose district includes where the SamTrans line ends, told the San Francisco Chronicle. "This is exactly the kind of street eviction we sued the state of Nevada a few years ago."
He was referring to the 2015 "greyhound therapy" process, which found that Nevada was giving unwanted psychiatric patients travel to California.
"It's unacceptable that agencies are playing what looks like a musical chair for the homeless."
SamTrans public affairs expert Dan Lieberman says the situation is not as complicated as people think and believes many of the homeless people who are placed on the airport buses are actually from San Francisco.
"From what we understand, these are the homeless people who end up at SFO and specifically receive a SamTrans token to return to San Francisco." he told ABC7. "Giving people a lift is what we do here. If someone pays the fare and wants to take the bus, we'll take it on the bus."
The result was a sloppy and dangerous game with homeless people trapped in the middle.
Last year, the Fast Traffic in the Bay Area was also criticized for dealing with transients. The train became a temporary shelter for the area's homeless, which caused many homeless passengers to be arrested late in the evening at the last stop on the BART line, with the nearest shelter about five miles away.
Democratic Mayor London Breed said this week she could not confirm allegations that the homeless were being transported to San Francisco – although there is recorded evidence that this happened several times – and said the prosecution office would investigate the matter.
"It's unfortunate if it's happening and our goal is to address it properly," she told ABC7. "There has to be an investigation because we need to determine whether or not there is evidence that this has happened."
San Francisco-born Robert Holt told Fox News he does not expect much from the mayor's word to analyze the situation.
"We've gotten used to her promises and promises, but there seem to be more homeless people on the street than ever," he said.
Former mayoral candidate Richie Greenberg agrees.
"Elected officials like Breed are less likely to speak out against other elected officials because it would hurt them politically or make it appear that their colleagues are not doing their job," he told Fox News.
The disturbing new allegations that nearby municipalities are dumping their homeless in San Francisco come as the city struggles with a double-digit jump in its homelessness rate and residents are turning to elected officials for their inability to reverse the trend.
A preliminary homeless count released in May showed that the number of homeless jumped 17% from 2017. However, when the final report was released a few months later, it showed that the increase in street count would increase. were 30 percent if the city had adhered to the same definition of homeless as in the past.
Critics say the city chose to use the federal definition of homeless rather than what they themselves wrote to make it appear that progress was being made. City officials have denied these allegations.