Dershowitz on reversing impeachment: & # 39; I am much more correct now & # 39;


Advertisement
Dershowitz, a recent addition to President Donald Trump's team, said Sunday that the authors of the constitution intended unthinkable conduct as "criminal conduct" and that Trump's accusations of obstruction of Congress and abuse of power do not meet constitutional criteria for impeachment.

But in 1998, Dershowitz said a president could be challenged even without being charged with a crime.

"It certainly doesn't have to be a crime if you have someone who completely corrupts the position of president and who abuses trust and who poses a great danger to our freedom, you don't need a technical crime," he said in "Larry King Live "in season.

Advertisement

When asked by CNN's Anderson Cooper on "Anderson Cooper 360" on Monday if he was wrong at the time, Dershowitz replied, "I was saying that I am much more correct now, after doing all the research, because that's the problem".

"I didn't do any research at that time, I relied on what the professors said … because that question was not raised in the Clinton impeachment," said Dershowitz. "Everyone knew he was accused of a crime, the question is whether it was a serious crime. Now, the question is whether a crime or criminal behavior is necessary."

He continued: "I did the research now – I was not wrong (at the time), now I am much more correct than I was at the time. I said you didn't need a technical crime at that time. You still don't think you need one. technical crime ".

Advertisement
On Sunday, Dershowitz told Brianna Keilar of CNN about "State of the Union" that in her Trump's defense during the Senate trial starting Tuesday, he would quote former Supreme Court judge Benjamin Curtis – the chief adviser during the impeachment of former President Andrew Johnson – in his argument that the authors intended unthinkable conduct to mean "criminal conduct".

The constitution says that presidents can be accused of "treason, bribery or other serious crimes and crimes", but does not define "crimes and serious crimes". Dershowitz's argument depends on the Senate agreeing that none of the charges Trump faces qualify as "criminal conduct".

Source link

Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *